http://philloseth.ca/2007/08/wasnt-it-a-near-collision/ enroute observations by Phil Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:53:45 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 http://philloseth.ca/2007/08/wasnt-it-a-near-collision/comment-page-1/#comment-78 Marc Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:01:09 +0000 http://philloseth.ca/2007/08/17/wasnt-it-a-near-collision/#comment-78 But a near-miss implies that they almost missed, but didn't, and in fact collided. But a near-miss implies that they almost missed, but didn’t, and in fact collided.

]]> http://philloseth.ca/2007/08/wasnt-it-a-near-collision/comment-page-1/#comment-69 Ryan Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:57:56 +0000 http://philloseth.ca/2007/08/17/wasnt-it-a-near-collision/#comment-69 Near-miss is the same as a close miss. It is a miss that was near, as opposed to far. Near-miss is the same as a close miss. It is a miss that was near, as opposed to far.

]]> http://philloseth.ca/2007/08/wasnt-it-a-near-collision/comment-page-1/#comment-61 Marc Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:04:04 +0000 http://philloseth.ca/2007/08/17/wasnt-it-a-near-collision/#comment-61 Good catch, Phil. I was once involved in a near-miss that totaled my car. Good catch, Phil. I was once involved in a near-miss that totaled my car.

]]>