Archive for April, 2008

The reality of absurdity

Tuesday, April 1st, 2008

After years of frustration about my inability to understand postmodernism, I have discovered an effortless way to actually write in a postmodern way. I produced a postmodern essay (partially reproduced below) with minimal effort today:

The Reality of Absurdity: Precapitalist constructive theory in the works of Joyce Catherine von Ludwig

1. Smith and subcultural dematerialism

The characteristic theme of the works of Smith is the common ground between society and sexual identity. Sartre uses the term ‘the textual paradigm of context’ to denote a mythopoetical totality.

“Sexuality is part of the collapse of art,” says Lyotard; however, according to Long, it is not so much sexuality that is part of the collapse of art, but rather the failure of sexuality. In a sense, the main theme of Dietrich’s critique of Batailleist `powerful communication’ is the difference between class and society. La Tournier implies that the works of Fellini are empowering.

If one examines the textual paradigm of context, one is faced with a choice: either reject the textual paradigm of context or conclude that the purpose of the artist is significant form, but only if precapitalist constructive theory is invalid. Thus, Foucault suggests the use of Batailleist `powerful communication’ to attack class divisions. If the textual paradigm of context holds, we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and postcultural dialectic theory.

“Class is unattainable,” says Baudrillard. But the subject is contextualised into a that includes reality as a paradox. Foucault uses the term ’subcapitalist nationalism’ to denote the futility, and subsequent fatal flaw, of semanticist sexual identity.

If one examines precapitalist constructive theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept the textual paradigm of context or conclude that society, somewhat ironically, has intrinsic meaning. Thus, the premise of the neodialectic paradigm of consensus holds that government is capable of truth, given that language is interchangeable with truth. Marx uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote the bridge between narrativity and sexual identity.

“Society is part of the failure of language,” says Lacan. It could be said that Wilson states that we have to choose between precapitalist constructive theory and Marxist class. Sartre promotes the use of textual theory to analyse sexuality.

In a sense, Sontag uses the term ‘the textual paradigm of context’ to denote a self-referential reality. In The Island of the Day Before, Eco reiterates Batailleist `powerful communication’; in The Name of the Rose, although, he denies the textual paradigm of context.

Therefore, Lyotard suggests the use of the subpatriarchial paradigm of context to deconstruct capitalism. If Batailleist `powerful communication’ holds, we have to choose between the textual paradigm of context and dialectic desublimation.

… etc.

All it took to produce this postmodernist essay was a click of a mouse button.

You can produce your own postmodernist essay by following this link to The Postmodernism Generator.