Late in 2010 Environment Canada issued its annual Canada’s Top Ten Weather Stories, and Saskatchewan is featured in two of the stories. Garnering 1/5 of the country’s weather stories is not bad for a province with about 1/35th of the country’s population.
The Saskatchewan stories are:
#3. From Dry to Drenched on the Prairies; and
I live in Saskatchewan, and I can verify that where I live had a cool and wet summer. In fact I have had discussions with a couple of people this year who used that fact to argue that global warming is a hoax. So why do I continue to agree with the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) view? I guess it’s because I recognize the fact that although Saskatchewan is relatively big, it’s a small fraction of the planet’s surface. In fact I have no problem believing Environment Canada when they state in the article that, “In 63 years of weather reporting, 2010 was the nation’s warmest ever with milder weather throughout the year. It featured the warmest winter and spring ever, the third warmest summer and the second warmest fall.”
Environment Canada has some really neat graphics if one digs around their website for them. Like this one showing Winter 2009/2010 (warmest on record):
And then there’s this graphic of Spring 2010 (warmest on record):
And this graphic of Summer 2010 (3rd warmest on record):
And this graphic showing Autumn 2010 (2nd warmest on record):
All four of those temperature anomaly maps show that although most of Canada, and especially the far north, was much warmer than normal, the southern half of Saskatchewan tended to be slightly below average. This kind of information helps me to understand the difference between annual temperatures at a provincial vs. national scale.
And of course Canada comprises a relatively small proportion of the globe, so it isn’t safe to infer that just because Environment Canada informs us that our nation had the warmest year on record means that 2010 was the warmest year on record globally. It will probably take the climatologists awhile to analyze the global data, but I am interested in seeing the results. Who knows, perhaps the analysis might provide support to the theory that the globe is cooling – it must be, after all New York City had a big snowfall.